The Pee on No-Pee Debate - A Question...

[russ]

Help me out here, often when people are discussing the pro's & con's of peeing or bottling while hunting the "pro-pee'ers" will inevitably mention a study that was done.

So here's my question - who did the study and where's the link to it?

I'm gonna be honest, a lot of people say they've done a lot of reading on it but the only references I'm finding are either anecdotal or mention "the study" without actually identifying the source.

So, who's gonna post up the link to the "scientific" source? (BTW outdoor writers, deer pee salemen & other internet forums don't count.)

[WOOKIE]

It's a conspiricy. All human pee that ends up in bottles because of the "study" gets sold back to you as Tinks 69 et al.

The pheromones in my pee, smell like the pheromones in your pee, smell like the pheromones in Bambi's pee.

Let er fly!

[russ]

It's a conspiricy. All human pee that ends up in bottles because of the "study" gets sold back to you as Tinks 69 et al.

The pheromones in my pee, smell like the pheromones in your pee, smell like the pheromones in Bambi's pee.

Let er fly!

and here's my point Wookie. Where's "the study"? Everyone quotes "it", no one sources "it".

[Mikey]

and here's my point Wookie. Where's "the study"? Everyone quotes "it", no one sources "it".

Didnt we have have a ****ing match 2 years ago about very same topic

ahhh yes here it is

http://bowzone.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=5460

[russ]

Didnt we have have a ****ing match 2 years ago about very same topic

ahhh yes here it is

http://bowzone.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=5460

Reading through that was good for a laugh...

pee'r. :D


Now, how about that link to "the study" I'm looking for?