What do you all think of this??

[scooter]

This was one of the new bows that was showcased at the ata show this year...What do you think??

Website (http://www.bladerunnerarchery.com/pages/4/index.htm)


http://www.bladerunnerarchery.com/images/575_bow.jpg

[Black Bull]

Kind of remember me of the Bear delta-5 in early 70.Kind of
Taureau noir :lolouch:

[cdn-redneck]

I am not willing say anything negative about it without seeing it or trying for real, but I don't think I will rush out looking for where I can find one. Oh yeah what is it? :?

[sniper]

Who's makin it? :?: :?:

[scooter]

Not sure sniper...The link is above the pic in the top post for their website....It looks like a new company...


Bladerunner Archery Home Office
5073 Bristol Industrial Way
Buford, GA 30518
Toll Free: 1-866-256-4499

Sales Office
Carey Moseley
Email: rcmdeer@bellsouth.net
Tel: (334) 260-9610
Fax: (334) 260-9996

[Gumby]

Looks different but I think there are too many moving parts for my liking. I like the kiss theory. Keep It Simple Stupid!! This thing looks like it might be tough to keep in tune. Who knows though it may be easy to tune. Might be neat to shoot though.

[tecspec]

:? :wink:
Kinda Interesting.
I'm gonna have to hit their website and check this out. I'd like to hear how much noise it makes. It's been my experience that the more moving parts there are, the more noise there is.

[tecspec]

:? :? :?
Was just on their site.
227 fps. AMO????? My old PSE Nova Fitzgerald is crankin' em' faster than that.

[Jack19]

Alot of moving parts. Need to try it out before making any judgement.

[scooter]

:? :? :?
Was just on their site.
227 fps. AMO????? My old PSE Nova Fitzgerald is crankin' em' faster than that.

Yup...what's that in IBO terms?

[Ishpah]

:lol: Looks like it came right from the old Allen drawing board. Pretty primative looking!

[tecspec]

8) :lol: :lol:
Close as I can figure, it's under 280 fps. IBO.

[Mikey]

meh
...looks whizzy ...the pic that is posted I really cant get a lookie at the cams and see what kind of ratio they have ... It looks like the design could work ....... but with double wheels the theory is there for a 35# draw doing the work of a 70#.

The dual Cam however I am not a big fan of .... one gets outta sync.... yer screwed ...with the elaborate pully system goin on there it tells me that the out of sync effects are just gonna be highlighted and exaggerated(sp??? Warden ...get a spell check on here )

Noise wont be a factor because I couldnt see that Bow be marketed for the hunter .... to many moving parts .... too much stuff to fail ....too Blingy ..... but it appears that Noise might have been a consideration by looking at the Limb mounting points ... (I dont wanna call it a riser 'cause i aint sure what to make of the whole thing yet) I think I see some sort of Vibration Dampening pads and stuff there .... I might be wrong however .... get rid of Vibs ...get rid of noise ...right


I wouldnt mind triing it out ....Just to be a little outside the box

Just my thoughts

Mikey


Just my opinion

[WOOKIE]

Like I said to Warden when he first showed it to me....."What in the **** would I use that thing for? I would be scared of getting an apendage caught in that contraption."

[sir_huntsalot]

Looks like trouble to me! I'll stick with what I have, I can't see it being much of a bow but it looks cool.

[bronco77]

It's still a 2 cam bow and I personally perfer the single cam.

Their website says,"there is practically no re-tuning required." which leads me to believe there must be some. :?

It is real short though :shock:

[bronco77]

It's still a 2 cam bow and I personally perfer the single cam.

Their website says,"there is practically no re-tuning required." which leads me to believe there must be some. :?

It is real short though :shock:

[bronco77]

It's still a 2 cam bow and I personally perfer the single cam.

Their website says,"there is practically no re-tuning required." which leads me to believe there must be some. :?

It is real short though :shock: